Comments on: America’s Favorite Anti-Vegan

By: anonymous

anonymous — Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:01:44 +0000

Regardless of whether a death is disturbing, it’s still a life. Also, a short but happy life is better than no life at all. I agree with humane treatment of animals, but not veganism. And aren’t there enough vegan forums already? We also don’t need to eat vegetables. We don’t need lots of stuff like cars, houses, flush toilets, air conditioning, checkers, or forums. But it makes life better, and that’s the thing. We could just live in caves and drink that fluid that keeps people with comas alive. But we don’t. I am speaking politely, and I am stating my opinion. As the constitution says we have freedom of speech. You also pretty much just personally attacked those anti-vegans.

By: Dave Norman

Dave Norman — Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:07:24 +0000

Concerning contestant #3: If a large percentage of the world’s population went vegan they simply would raise less cattle and hogs. They wouldn’t release the animals to multiply in the wild. Humans have complete control over their population. I admit these animals are raised just to the age that they would make good food then they are slaughtered. I think it is better to have a short life than none at all.
I think we have canine teeth for a reason.

By: mindy

mindy — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:23:33 +0000

Johnny for sure – he demonstrates the level of intelligence of a vegan-hater. He is really representing!
.-= mindy´s last blog ..How All Farm Animals Should Live =-.

By: Alex

Alex — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:09:25 +0000

"He who does not possess power loses the right to life," wrote Hitler. Might-makes-right-Johnny is in good company. He wins. .-= Alex´s last blog ..Beware the sophists under a flag of neutrality =-.

By: AK_

AK_ — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:22:35 +0000

I vote for Johnny- his statement dabbles into religion, stupidity, and ignorance. Although Sam’s statement is completely wrong, it is a more common argument against vegans than Johnny’s.

By: MarkDTN8

MarkDTN8 — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:36:58 +0000

I vote for Sam. Although he raises a good point, with cattle overpopulating the world as he thinks they would, we wouldn’t want low income housing or project type housing for the cattle, because that would lead to criminal cattle behavior like selling illegal hay/straw to each other or WORSE to underaged calves, god forbid. Sorry Sam #FAIL! He may also think that bees would swarm the globe if we stopped using honey – very scifi – and I don’t even want to imagine how dangerous oceans, lakes and rivers will become once the fish/crustaceans take over, I mean what will we do?