A Lesson In Activism

Here is a lesson in activism: mainstream media makers are generally lazy. Creative message-makers can capitalize on that.

The lesson comes from FARM. Here is a newspaper’s account of events:

A Lothrop Street, Beverly resident who has supposedly written dozens of letters to the editor supporting being a vegan and opposing eating meat doesn’t exist.
And the Beverly address he was using as his home address is also phony.
A man named Matthew Warden has written at least 24 letters to the Citizen since 2004, according to a search of the paper’s archives. In the letters, Warden often wrote opposing eating meat.

Note:

  • No mention of the newspaper’s missing fact-checking department.
  • No apology for publishing letters that weren’t local.
  • No explanation for a letters-to-the-editor policy that requires a local address yet waits 5 years to verify that address.

I think it’s all pretty funny.

Remember kids, the world is run by those who show up. SHOW UP.

3 Responses to A Lesson In Activism

  1. Regarding bullet #1: Unless it’s a very large paper, newspapers generally don’t have fact checkers.

    Also, an administrative assistant or the opinions editor only verifies the phone numbers of letter writers — and sometimes they don’t even do that.

    All the facts of this case haven’t been made public yet, though.
    Tracy´s last blog ..Animal Agribusiness vs. the Environment My ComLuv Profile

  2. “All the facts of this case haven’t been made public yet, though.”

    What a tease! Now I’m super curious.

  3. The newspaper that ran the story mentioned above did verify the letters. They called the phone number they were given by the letter-writer to verify and it checked out. But, then several things led the staff to be suspicious.

    Why should the newspaper apologize? The organization that unlawfully used a Beverly resident’s address to write letters to the editor owes that resident an apology.

    I totally support veganism. However, I think that using tactics such as making up names and addresses to write letters to the editor discredits the movement. No organization should use such tactics.

Respond

Please abide by the Vegan Soapbox Discussion Policy, which prohibits anti-animal and anti-human discussion, for example, no pro-meat, pro-dairy, pro-eggs, pro-hunting, racist, sexist, homophobic, ageist, abilist or otherwise hateful comments.